1 / 3
Critically assess an experiment
Assess claims by considering assignment, multiple tests and uncertainty together.
Reading progress stays in this browser only and is removed when you clear site data.
Random assignment
2 min · Use chance to allocate experimental conditions.A/B test
3 min · Compare two options fairly.Effect size
3 min · Express how large a difference or relationship is.Practical significance
3 min · Evaluate whether a finding matters for a real decision.Statistical power
3 min · The probability of detecting a specified real effect.Type II error
3 min · Fail to reject a null hypothesis that is false.p-value
2 min · Assess incompatibility with a null hypothesis.Multiple testing
3 min · Consider false alarms across a set of tests.Bonferroni correction
3 min · A simple way to limit false positives across a test family.Confidence interval
4 min · Show uncertainty, not just a single number.Think through a case
A team randomly assigns users to two interfaces. Without selecting a primary metric in advance, it tests 20 metrics and highlights one with p=0.04 as proof of success.
Answer three questions about the scenario below.
2 / 3
p=0.04 means the new interface has a 96% probability of being better.
3 / 3
A decision should consider effect size, its confidence interval and implementation cost.
Quiz summary
This summary shows your latest answers and resets when you reload the page.
Put this learning path into practice.
Choose a guide connected to the concepts in this path. These optional activities do not count towards your reading progress.
Compare two group means
Work with the mini survey and compare your output with the expected result.
Connected concepts in this path: Practical significance
Compare two group means
Work with the mini survey and compare your output with the expected result.
Connected concepts in this path: Practical significance